El Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:03:04 +0100 Jens Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Ismael Luceno wrote: > > Well, I got some personal problems, and had no time to work on > > initng or even maintain a presence on IRC, and please everyone > > apologize me for the meeting. > > > > Now I got some little time to play with initng... I make no > > promises, but I will try to hunt some bugs ;). > > > > And about the second topic, I've been using git for about 2 months, > > and I think we should use it, there's a lot of advantages (and some > > little cons): > > > > - It's a lot faster for almost everything. > > - It's fully distributed. > > - It takes more disk space (however, disk space is cheap). > > - The initial downloads takes a lot, but we can provide snapshot > > tarballs and avoid users cloning from the server. If they really > > want a copy, it could be cloned from a developer's machine (yes, I > > know, everyone will clone my repo :P). > > > > That's all folks! > > > > > Hello there old friend, hope you manage the problems. Anyway, I vote > to stick with svn. And what about the new Initng-scripts? Are they > delayed even further now? Or even cancelled? > initng-scripts is ready, but there's a bug in initng that prevents the release (#799). BTW, I've done some experimentation on boot speed, and found two significant bottlenecks: 1) system/udev/filldev: takes 4~5 secs, sometimes more. 2) system/clock: takes 3 secs approx. Without these delays, we probably could boot in about 5 secs (including an X display manager) on many systems. -- Ismael Luceno
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
