also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.09.0257 +0200]: > I can use my time to do both, and that's what i'm doing.
Of course I did not mean to tell you how to use your time! Sorry. > Sometimes it's hard to figure out because i don't like to > participate on these Debian "mailing list parties " (aka: > flamewars). I don't think there are too many RC bugs, and it seems > that the release team schedule looks sane until now. I'm asking > for some more work towards Etch not new gratuitous RC bugs. Sure, but our release schedule is not sane, it needs *a lot* of work. And there are too many RC bugs. > Anyway, i think you're suggesting to throw out SELinux support and LSB > 3.1 compliance for Etch, right ? No. But LSB compliance does not include init.d scripts, and SELinux support is also only a goal, not a blocker. > Based on Carlos' progress (as i cited in my first message), we > should put some effort to deliver a better Etch with the current > schedule. I don't think it will be possible to SELinux and > probably other pet release goals thought. Well, then I suggest you start by doing the work and filing bugs with patches. When you reach a point where you can say "if all these bugs were merged, we would have LSB compliance", then I suppose we can see what to do from there and proceed with the NMUs. Does this sound fair? -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system "try to remove the color-problem by restarting your computer several times." -- microsoft internet explorer's readme.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
_______________________________________________ initscripts-ng-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/initscripts-ng-devel
