On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 12:27 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 21.06.2007, 12:04 +0100 schrieb Scott James Remnant: > > On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 11:26 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Should-Start and Should-Stop are trickier to implement, since these need > > to be added to the named jobs, rather than the one being processed. > > Actually, we do not support these runlevel-specifiying fields in > metainit, as they are very init system specific. In debian, by default, > all daemons start in 2,3,4,5 anyways... > Ah, I see what these do... You could actually make these work in Upstart with states as well:
while not runlevel 2
> > I suspect the likely use within Ubuntu will be primarily for packages in
> > Universe, and those in main that are literally just basic services. For
> > services and tasks that we care about, we're likely to directly ship
> > Upstart definitions, since we would want the flexibility those allow.
>
> Right, that’s understanding as well. It would be great if metainit
> could, for basic services, save ubuntu the effort of creating upstart
> jobs and in return we can work together to make metainit create nice
> upstart jobs and convert more basic services to metainit.
>
My Perl is rather rusty, so I wouldn't like to try and hack on it
directly; but I'd be happy to provide whatever guidance someone needs to
do it.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
Ubuntu Development Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ initscripts-ng-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/initscripts-ng-devel
