Hi Friends,
        Trying to make brief as possible.  (Martin, specific question for you 
in 
this.) (But comments welcome from anyone.)
        Some few months ago, there was a request on this list to update the 
Video Tutorials page (https://inkscape.org/en/learn/videos/).  After some 
discussion, it was decided it would be better to put the effort into getting 
better tutorials uploaded into the Tutorials section of the gallery 
(https://inkscape.org/en/gallery/=tutorial/?order=-edited).
        At that time, I mentioned my plan to re-contact all the tutorial 
authors, that I've already contacted once before, for the tutorials I have 
already curated (or vetted) on this page 
https://forum.inkscapecommunity.com/index.php, inform them, if they aren't 
already aware of the new website, and including instructions to upload their 
tutorials, if they are interested.  This bug report covers several related 
ideas:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape-web/+bug/1603669  (Someone else is 
going through a similar process for Inkscape extensions.)
        But I can't start on it, at least until the forum situation is settled. 
So I was thinking, if there would be some way to allow anyone to vet tutorials, 
which either are already uploaded, or which they want to upload; then anyone 
who 
wants to could get started already.
        I wrote some brief guidelines, which I thought to upload to both 
tutorial pages (text and video) (or maybe combine both pages into just the 
vetting guidelines page).  However, in some discussion with Maren about moving 
forward with the plan, we've realized that this can't be done without some 
somewhat significant changes to the website.
        (For the record, when I say "we" it doesn't mean both of us are in 
favor 
of doing this.  She actually isn't in favor of it, but is still helping figure 
out if it could be done, and how.)
        We can't have a tag such as "vetted" or "approved" for tutorials, 
because anyone, just anyone, could add such a tag, whether they actually have 
read or viewed or worked through the tutorial or not.  Theoretically, even 
spammers could use it.  Theoretically, if there's a way to disallow tags, maybe 
certain words should be disallowed, like "approved" for example.
        So there needs to be a way to either make a particular tag/filter 
("vetted" or "approved" or other) available only for certain people, or only 
make it available for a certain user group.  In discussions with Maren (who 
knows more about the inner workings of the website than I do), there doesn't 
seem to be any way to make any certain tags available (or not available) for 
only certain people to use.
        But there does seem to be some functionality, which has been planned 
for, but not actually functioning yet, to allow for resource uploads to be 
approved.  Maren says that we have 2 database fields, called 'checked_by' 
(person) and 'checked_sig' (person's signature), which are specifically created 
for approving uploads.  She suggests making a bug/wishlist report to request 
these fields be defined (and made functional).
        I would suggest attaching them to the Inkscape User account (or some 
other account which can be used for this).  And then we would just give people 
who are interested in vetting tutorials (or other resources), access to that 
account.  So question for Martin.
        Before I make the bug report, is there some reason why it would be a 
waste of time for tutorials?  Could this be done before the forum issue is 
settled?  Because if not, by then I'll be able to start on the vetting process 
that I've already been planning (see link to bug report above).  But if it 
could 
be done before then, then other people could start vetting tutorials that I 
might not have even seen yet.  (I've been putting off my twice yearly update of 
that page, while working on the new forum issue.  So certainly there are plenty 
I haven't seen yet.)
        Or is there some other reason why this plan would not work?  Or should 
something else be included in the report (in case I'm not understanding 
something correctly?

Thanks for any comments,
brynn



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-docs mailing list
Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs

Reply via email to