> -----Original Message-----
> From: Garrett Goebel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Eric,
> 
> From: Kort, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > On a completely unrelated note, why is it that many (some?) 
> > of us (myself included, though I don't know why) tend to
> > reply to the author of these inline related emails
> >_in addition to_ [EMAIL PROTECTED], such that the author
> > gets two copies of the message?
> 
> It's a religious thing... I won't be surprised if someone 
> post a link to
> someone's doctoral thesis on the question of "reply to" list 
> or sender by
> the time I finish this email. The general concept goes 
> something along the
> line of "configuring mailing list software to manipulate the 
> headers is
> evil. It loses vitally important information and hurts 
> children and the
> elderly."
> 

Oh...being both a theist and a future pediatrician, I am completely in favor
if it then.  In fact, I'll CC Garrett a couple of extra times on this email
just to be sure to protect those children and elderly.

(Are we still on topic here?)

Eric

Reply via email to