Neil,
From: Neil Watkiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > Can you make a 'pre' version available for the more curious
> > inliners who don't mind patching inline themselves?
>
> Sure! When I get home, I'll fire a dist together and put it
> on a webpage.
Great. Where'd you put it?
I'm actually doing something today that where I could try slipping in
Inline::Struct in place of what I'm already using.
> The question is, what "special" methods do Inline::Struct
> objects need to support?
> o give me the keys (in the struct order)
> o give me the values (in the struct order)
> o give me the hash (in hash or struct order, I don't care)
> o give me the array (in the struct order)
> o give me the value of this field
> o set this field to this value
Well... how about I give you patches for the ones I want?
> > Perhaps a future version will support:
> > o TIEHASH and/or TIEARRAY?
> > o _VALUES?
>
> Tied hashed would be pretty cool -- the keys would be in the correct
> order. The _VALUES is already secretly supported; it's called _ARRAY.
doh ;-)
