----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee Goddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 9:07 PM Subject: Re: Building modules
> Hello Rob > > Did you know Inline comes as a AS binary-package now? > > ppm install Inline > Hi Lee, Good to see you're back on line again ! I actually have no problem with the inline module. However, I do have a module (a C extension) that I've compiled using Inline. Because this module is built using inline (as opposed to the XS method) it seems that it will only work on machines that contain the Inline module. I was wondering if it was possible to use Inline to build a module in such a way that the module does *not* need the inline module. I anticipate (though have not yet verified) that there might be a problem in using my module on Win98, because Inline and 98 seem not to get along with each other very well. (On the other hand, if I'd built my module the old fashioned XS way, there would be no such problem on 98 because the module would not be reliant upon Inline.) Anyway, I'll transfer my module from my 2k box to my 98 box, then install my Inline 0.43 binary on my 98 box, and then see if it works. Oh, hell................. I'm probably still being as clear as mud :-) Cheers, Rob
