On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Aaron J Mackey wrote: > Fundamentally, though, > there's the idea that this isn't really an "Inline" package, as in > "(pre)compile this bit of native language in some other language-space and > then make it available to my perl script". It's more of a "automatically > build perl subroutines for me that make use of DBI". So maybe it's more > of a DBIx::Inline::SQL or somesuch.
My Inline::Octave package doesn't compile anything - it hooks perl to an octave interpreter and shuffles data and commands back and forth. The great thing is that we have the "abstraction" of an Inline language. People like this. I think the idea of Inline::SQL is great! On the other hand - I don't really care what you call it. andy _______________________________________ Andy Adler, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
