On 02/07/02 18:32 +1000, Ken Williams wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 01:25 AM, Brian Ingerson wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > > > I think you're best off to use one directory per .pm. I'd like > > to see why > > this would be a pain. You'd pretty much need to do the same > > thing in XS. > > XS isn't typically a good benchmark for programmer convenience. ;-) > > It would be a pain because my working directories would no > longer mirror the structure of my code. It would also be a pain > to maintain many separate Makefile.PLs instead of just one > centralized one. > > > > Of course, if you can convince me of a better way I'll do it for you :) > > What an offer. =) > > The way I'd like to see it work is that I could have all my > modules in a lib/ directory, the same way I'd usually have them > if I weren't using Inline. Then, in each .pm file I used Inline > for, I'd just put the correct 'use Inline' statements into the > modules.
OK. Fair enough. I'll look into it and maybe get you a patch if it's not too hard. Cheers, Brian
