On 07/10/02 07:40 -0400, Aaron J Mackey wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Sisyphus wrote: > > > While improvements to Inline are being discussed, is there any chance of > > having the contents of out.make tee'd to stdout ? > > Just to extend this wishlist a little, is there any chance that instead of > having #line cpp directives pointing to Module.xs, would it be possible > to have them pointing to Module.pm (i.e. the file that we're actually > editing in?)
This can be done, sure. It's kind of low priority right now. I think I'd rather do this as an option, since it can't always work. You need to read in the .pm or .pl file and parse it. But what if the code is expanded from an interpolated string? That said, most times it should be possible, and it's useful for sure. I'll add it to the list. Cheers, Brian
