Rob, Major apologies for pointing you to that repo in that state. Evidentally I was in the middle of pulling Inline::C out of the Inline dist. I completely forgot about that.
I just set the repo back to the 0.44 code. Just run 'svn update' and you should be happy. Thanks, Ingy PS Module::Install is awesome. You just needed to install it. But now, it's a moot point until sometime in a year or 10 until I change the Makefile.PL to use it. On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Sisyphus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi, > I was unaware (until Ingy told me) that there's an Inline svn repo at > http://svn.kwiki.org/ingy/Inline/ . > It seems quite broken - there's no C.pm and the Makefile.PL begins with: > > use inc::Module::Install; > > which throws an immediate error, because inc/Module/Install.pm doesn't > exist. > Is anyone here contributing to that repo ? > > I approached Ingy with the aim of (me) getting a new release of Inline out > (with some documentation errors and bugs fixed), thinking that the base code > that I work with would be the Inline-0.44 release. Instead, I find the base > code (from the svn repo) that I'm supposed to work with is broken in > mysterious ways - which dampens my enthusiasm somewhat. > > Nothing kills my interest in a project quicker than seeing a Makefile.PL > that begins with "use inc::Module::Install;". If it's up to me, the first > thing I'd do is remove that line and revert to an Inline-0.44 type setup - > but I can't just walk in and immediately start stomping all over someone > else's vision for the future (especially if that someone is Ingy :-) > > If Ingy doesn't see this post I'll raise this issue with him, anyway. In > the meantime, I'm just wondering whether there are others here that have > been contributing to the svn repo - and if so, what are the thoughts of > those people ? > > (In fact, *any* thoughts from *anyone* might be helpful :-) > > Cheers, > Rob >
