Too much attention to unrelated details such as SvPV_nolen With this amount of explanations - I would throw away closely unrelated text but in return insert there another colorful examples, which in turn uncover something useful.
And even I would remove "use warnings;" line - inserting it here there and everywhere is just eating useful screen space of information. The shorter the better... Consider that you've already convinced all around people to actually insert this "use warnings;" and no more need to convince people even more. Other than that - nice wording, nice effort, thank you for that, you're making world better :):) From: Ron Grunwald via inline [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 5:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Inline::C Cookbook addition Hi all, Just providing an update to this thread. I did end up submitting an updated "Cookbook.swim" as a pull request with the help of several contributors. A few days ago, Ingy was kind enough to merge the change with the Inline::C master branch. The new recipe is titled "Direct Access to Perl variables" and is placed at the end of the section "Meat & Potatoes". Thank you to everyone who assisted me. Cheers, Ron. On 21 Dec 2016, at 7:16 am, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: From: Ron Grunwald Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 9:33 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Inline::C Cookbook addition This mailing list is very quiet these days and I think your request will probably fall "through the cracks" unless you submit it as a github "Issue" or a github pull request. For completeness, I did write up the recipe and submitted it as an issue on github about 3 days ago, https://github.com/ingydotnet/inline-c-pm/issues/56 There havn't been any comments made so far, so I'm not sure if its being considered for the C Cookbook. Also, it looks like no updates were made to Inline::C for the last two years. Cheers, Ron Hi Ron, Yes, I don't know when your request will be acted upon. But it's now in a place where it won't get lost - and whenever someone decides to update Inline::C they should see that request and give it the consideration it deserves. Cheers, Rob
