Was this thread ever resolved? The last post I found was on 2011-Apr-15, and it didn't really resolve anything.
I'm a relative newbie with ITK, and I received some code written by an ex-employee who's not available to answer our questions. In his home-built algorithm (using ITK 3.17), he has a class, derived from itk::Object, in which he uses itkSetMacro for variables of type std::vector. As far as I can tell, he got around the compile errors related to << by setting the preprocessor flag NDEBUG instead of _DEBUG. That seems like an ugly hack to me, and I'm wondering what would be the preferred approach using ITK coding style guidelines. Thanks in advance for your help. --Luis Luis F. Gutiérrez Senior Member Research Staff Interventional Guidance Technology Philips Research North America 345 Scarborough Road Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510 Tel: +1 914 945 6097 Fax: +1 914 945 6330 Cell: +1 201 927 6894 ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit: http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
