I was able to get quite similar numbers on RH w/ gcc 4.4.7 in standard release 
mode:

Array size = 100, repetitions = 20000000
The elapsed time for a C++ fill_n 690000 ms.
The elapsed time for a itk.Fill   1910000 ms.
The elapsed time for a C   fill   2620000 ms.

Array size = 1000, repetitions = 2000000
The elapsed time for a C++ fill_n 460000 ms.
The elapsed time for a itk.Fill   1700000 ms.
The elapsed time for a C   fill   2520000 ms.

Array size = 10000, repetitions = 200000
The elapsed time for a C++ fill_n 420000 ms.
The elapsed time for a itk.Fill   1680000 ms.
The elapsed time for a C   fill   2510000 ms.

Array size = 100000, repetitions = 20000
The elapsed time for a C++ fill_n 570000 ms.
The elapsed time for a itk.Fill   1670000 ms.
The elapsed time for a C   fill   2510000 ms.

Array size = 1000000, repetitions = 2000
The elapsed time for a C++ fill_n 600000 ms.
The elapsed time for a itk.Fill   1680000 ms.
The elapsed time for a C   fill   2510000 ms.

Array size = 10000000, repetitions = 200
The elapsed time for a C++ fill_n 1510000 ms.
The elapsed time for a itk.Fill   1820000 ms.
The elapsed time for a C   fill   2540000 ms.

I did modify the test to set the value to 3.14, instead of 0, because other 
optimization may happen with a zero value...

Brad

On Apr 10, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Bill Lorensen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Or maybe Ubuntu is milliseconds and windows is seconds?
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Bill Lorensen <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> The Ubuntu timings are much longer than windows. Was that expected?
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:42 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Staring, M. (LKEB)
> Sent: woensdag 10 april 2013 16:28
> To: Insight Developers ([email protected])
> Subject: FW: fill
> 
> Forgot to include the maliing list
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Staring, M. (LKEB)
> Sent: woensdag 10 april 2013 16:24
> To: 'Williams, Norman K'; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: fill
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Attached you can find some timings for different POD types, I tested for 
> short, int, float and double. std::fill_n is always faster, but less so for 
> longer types.
> 
> I simply modified itk::Array::Fill to use std::fill_n instead of referring to 
> the vnl_vector::fill which uses a simple loop over the data. Not sure if this 
> is the way to go, but my experimental looks green:
> 
>         http://open.cdash.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=2871413
> 
> The patch I just submitted to gerrit:
> 
>         http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/10801/
> 
> Curious to your comments,
> 
> Regards, Marius
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

Reply via email to