I’ve been trying to help out with changes related to the HDF5ImageIO, and there’s a string of 4 different patches:
http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16579<http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16579/> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16578 http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16577 http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16576 Incredibly, 16578 and 16579 seem to be circularly dependent. I’ve just pushed a new version of 16576 which addresses the comments Matt made. Should those others be abandoned and one free-standing patch be made of the actually substantive changes? ________________________________ Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you. ________________________________
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit: http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
