> That's *exactly* my point. The business cast blame on the church, and > the church blamed back. That said, I know and like Harry, and would > normally be supportive of his approach. I just don't think this time he > was as wise in his retort as you do, that's all.
No, that is not what was involved. The corporate sector did not blame the church for their actions. Nor did Harry blame the corporate sector for the church's actions. Indeed, he accepted the church's culpability. The brilliance of his retort was to do this ***at the same time *** as restoring focus on the corporate sector. I have mixed feelings about the Christian church, including my own church - the Uniting Church. However, the bouquets belong with the brickbats. I also appreciate that Harry cops a lot of flak because his emphasis on social justice makes people feel uncomfortable, and properly so. He deserves a little support now and then, I think. - Greg ------------------------------------------------------ - You are subscribed to the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the message body 'unsubscribe insights-l' (ell, not one (1)) See: http://nsw.uca.org.au/insights-l-information.htm ------------------------------------------------------
