Darren J Moffat wrote: > Sarah Jelinek wrote: >> Hi Darren, >> >> This is a known bug, well a generalized issue with live upgrade. >> There are several bugs opened about this: >> 6416068 lucreate doesn't work if a BE has disappeared due to the >> disk, and ludelete can't clean it up >> 6450469 Failed lucreate attempt leaves cruft behind >> >> And probably more... > > Thanks. > >>> >>> It seems that from the error messages this was yet again caused by >>> the lofs mounts of libc - which I still maintain was a REALLY bad >>> solution to this problem ( ere have been so many issues in various >>> parts of the system as a result of this). >>> >> Can't find any bugs on this. I assume you are referring to lucopy >> doing the lofs mount of libc? It looks to me like it does that anyway. >> sarah > > I mean the whole concept of using an lofs mount for $HWCAP/$PLATFORM > variants of libc, it has caused issues with GNOME, flash, live upgrade > and just looks strange! yeah.. James and I had a discussion offline about this issue. I wasn't sure what you were referring to, but now I understand. And, yes, it is a bad solution.
thanks, sarah ****
