> I'd be surprised if the RE has a target for this, but asking me won't> get
> you the answer.
That's too bad. I was hoping that you might be able to find that infromation
out easier than me.
> I don't know what those suspicions were, but having a libc that's out> of
> step with the running kernel is toxic.
That was one of my suspicions, and a major one at that. Most of the others
revloved around this key piece of information about libC.
> I have no idea what's going on with your other "trivial fix," so I'm> afraid
> I can't comment on that.
That's OK, since I wasn't expecting a comment on that topic. Although I do hope
that it will make at least a part of the OpenSolaris community consider the
effects of "overengineering" everything, including collaboration efforts.
Again, no comment is required. Considering the topic will suffice.
_________________________________________________________________
Make every IM count. Download Windows Live Messenger and join the i?m
Initiative now. It?s free.?
http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGWL_June07
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/install-discuss/attachments/20070619/08f0a2c9/attachment.html>
