Talking of the SUNWicda issues we had the following P1 bug passed to us (Solaris RPE, Data team):
6481557 patch T118833-29 will not install in miniroot <http://monaco.sfbay/detail.jsf?cr=6481557> I added the following to the bug: === I'm not a SBD expert but here's my analysis: In essence, we need to ship SUNWicda in a patch that can be applied to the mini-root of network install images. The dependency was created by this fix: 6438773 install needs way of (de)selecting Secure by default It introduced a change in sysidget which checks for a new install profile option called "service_profile" which can be "limited_net" or "open". See: <http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/security/projects/sbd/sbd_design> So if the latest KU, which contains SBD bits is installed in the mini-root the resulting boot image may not install properly unless the updated sysidget binary is also present - hence the dependency check. I've no idea of the history of the prepatch script and I don't believe they are versioned. It's thus difficult to determine quite why the changes were made, when and by whom. Given that we *must* be able to apply the KU to any Solaris 10 net install image and SBD requires sysidget with the SBD changes, then we must make the updated SUNWicda package available somewhere - probably as a patch. We can't make the KU depend on the proposed SUNWicda patch as it's only required when patching the mini-root. === -- Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3249 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/install-discuss/attachments/20061017/3096ace0/attachment.bin>
