Some additional comments on your comments below!
Mike

> > 5) I think this first page could use a title (e.g. "Select a 
> > language", or "select a locale").
> What language would you put it in? We could, of course, title the 
> window with something like "Language". We are removing the specific 
> concept of "locale" as it is confusing for many. Locale does make an implicit 
> appearance later when the user selects the primary language to be 
> used after rebooting - the language selection is paired with a country, 
> but this does not require the use to understand "locale".

SuSE and Ubuntu both put the title in English.  
   http://www.zenstarstudio.com/install/ubuntu.htm
   http://www.zenstarstudio.com/install/index.htm

I don't think there's a perfect solution here,
but having a title would be more consistent, I think.

> > 7) Why are the first two pages completed with "OK", but the next 
> > pages completed with "Next>"?   It seems to me that it might be more 
> > consistent to use "Next>" throughout.
> As mentioned in another reply, the user can't return to these 
> pages once they reach the Welcome page.

Hmmm...why is that?

> > 9) On the Disk page, the "type '=' into any partition size to adjust 
> > the available disk space" seems strange.  What does it do?  (I 
> > couldn't figure out how to type an equal sign into any Size field 
> > here).  That would be a fairly non-standard thing to do -- what's the 
> > intent here?
> Typing "=" into any partition size field adjusts that partition's 
> size by the "Available" size amount such that the available disk space 
> goes to zero - no remaining unused/over allocated disk space. Save the 
> user from having to do the mental arithmetic. There is a "bug" in the 
> current implementation - changes should occur on the keystroke, not when 
> the field looses focus.

Hmmm... typing "=" into a numeric field is very non-intuitive to me.  I don't 
recall any
application ever doing this either.  Perhaps it would be better to have buttons 
to do this?
(BTW, I don't think it worked by losing focus either -- I tried that a couple 
of times, and it didn't do anything -- I could have missed this though?)

> > 10) If I have one active partition, and I make it smaller, 
> should the available space show up in the "Unused" partition?  Or maybe, I'm 
> not 
> > sure how the "unused" partition type works, because its size field is 
> > greyed out and set to zero when I select "Unused".  Don't "Unused" 
> > partitions also have sizes?
> No, the released disk space shows up in Available at the bottom. 
> We shouldn't presume the user is freeing up space for a new 
> partition. They may be freeing it up to increase the size of another 
> partition. 
> Unused partitions do not have sizes. Again, the keystroke entry "bug" in 
> Q9 is probably creating some confusion.

Hmmm...why don't unused partitions have sizes?  That's unexpected for me.  When 
I
ran through the demo, I was trying to reserve some partitions for later use by 
Linux 
(which Solaris should consider "unused"), so forcing it to zero size was quite 
unexpected 
for me.

> > 13) It could probably also be localized as per the initial two 
> panels. (e.g. in Europe, the order is different from the US.)
> We don't want to force the user to specify a locale in addition to 
> a language in the first panel.

Then, YYYY-MM-DD doesn't show up, when non-English languages are in use, right? 
 (Y/M/D
are English-centric abbreviations).

> > 14) Hmmm...the Hour field is 0 - 12.  That doesn't seem right.  Are 0 
> > AM and 0 PM both valid times?  There is no 0 pm, but there are both 0 and 
> > 12 am depending on 
> 12/24 hour time.

So, what happens if I select 0 PM (which the GUI allows)?  Since the numbers 
13-23 are not in the list, I assumed that 24-hour time entry was not 
possible....

> > 16) Might want to consider making the hour field and the AM/PM 
> fields 24 hour in other locales (or maybe you already did this?  I 
> didn't check... :-)
> User selectable AM/PM/24.

How do I get to the 24-hour time entry (from the English language installer)?

> >
> > 17) On the Users screen, if the passwords don't match for the user 
> > account, the error message is "User account error - must enter all or 
> > none of the user account information".  This is fairly generic (and 
> > somewhat misleading).
> > I think there's a much better way to handle errors:  if the data 
> is invalid (e.g. passwords don't match), then don't enable the "Next>" 
> > button.  (Of course, make sure that there's a visible error message 
> > somewhere in this case.)  When the data is there, the Next> button 
> > should be the default when ENTER is pressed.
> Again, the user may not realize why the Next is not enabled even 
> with a visible message. Users often don't look where we want them too. 
> Myself included.  ;-)  We are working with the Docs folks to improve the 
> message text.

I think that disabling the NEXT> button is a fairly standard way 
of doing this...I'm essentially asserting that users wouldn't have this problem,
because this already occurs frequently.  

This would be a testable assertion, of course! :-)

> > 18) Same thing on the Install page -- if I haven't accepted the terms 
> > of the license agreement, don't enable the Install button for me.
> Again, we don't want to make the user guess. More work for us to 
> add the extra error messages, but you'll note that we are allowing the 
> user to accept the license within the dialog, which then proceeds to the 
> next screen, rather than forcing the user to close the dialog, check 
> the box, and click Install again.

Yep -- it's probably more work either way.



Reply via email to