Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 12:40:20PM -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
>>  Ceri Davies wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I'm trying to get an alternative boot environment created on Solaris 10,
>>> 11/06, and am having problems with the "merged" keyword.
>>> I want to create a new BE on c0t0d0s5, and merge / and /usr onto it.
>>> Here's what I think will do that:
>>> # lucreate -n be2 -c be1 -m /:/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s5:ufs -m /usr:merged:ufs
>>> Discovering physical storage devices
>>> Discovering logical storage devices
>>> Cross referencing storage devices with boot environment configurations
>>> Determining types of file systems supported
>>> Validating file system requests
>>> ERROR: cannot check device name <merged> for device path abbreviation
>>> ERROR: cannot determine if device name <merged> is abbreviated device path
>>> ERROR: cannot create new boot environment using file systems as configured
>>> ERROR: please review all file system configuration options
>>> ERROR: cannot create new boot environment using options provided
>>> Is the merged keyword broken, or am I doing this wrong?
>>  What are the mount points in the existing boot environment (vfstab contents 
>>  should be sufficient)?
> 
> vfstab contents on this particular system are not currently available,
> I'm afraid, but they are those created by this JumpStart profile header:
> 
>   install_type            initial_install
>   system_type             standalone
>   partitioning            explicit
>   filesys                 mirror:d10 c0t0d0s0 c0t1d0s0 4096 /
>   filesys                 mirror:d20 c0t0d0s1 c0t1d0s1 4096 swap
>   filesys                 mirror:d30 c0t0d0s3 c0t1d0s3 8192 /usr
>   filesys                 mirror:d40 c0t0d0s4 c0t1d0s4 4096 /var
>   # c0t0d0s5 and c0t1d0s5 for Live Upgrade
>   filesys                 c0t0d0s5 6144
>   filesys                 c0t1d0s5 6144
>   # These for ZFS.
>   filesys                 c0t0d0s6 free
>   filesys                 c0t1d0s6 free
>   metadb                  c0t0d0s7 count 3 size 8192
>   metadb                  c0t1d0s7 count 3 size 8192
> 
> 
>> SPARC or x86?
> 
> SPARC.
> 

I have a strong suspicion that there's a very basic set of breakage 
related to SVM support in Live Upgrade as we already have a bug with 
somewhat similar symptoms reported (but not yet investigated) with other 
options and SVM:

6539276 lucreate failed  when using detach,attach,preserve on a SVM 
mirrored root

I'd suggest pursuing this through your service contract since it's 
Solaris 10.

Dave

Reply via email to