-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dave,
ARP codepoints have been in the Assigned Numbers RFC for a while, since RFC 900 (June 1984). AFAICT, IANA took over everything in Assigned Numbers as a starting point when it was created. Is there something more specific you're looking for, and if so, does it exist for other similarly legacy sets of code points? Joe Dave Thaler wrote: > Yeah they may be keeping track, but as noted there, there's nowhere that > authorizes IANA to assign any numbers. > > -Dave > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 3:42 PM >> To: Dave Thaler >> Cc: Internet Area >> Subject: Re: [Int-area] ARP IANA considerations >> >> Dave, >> >>> As far as I know, it is not an IANA-maintained registry. >>> The numbering space can only be extended by RFC. >>> >> IANA is keeping track of the parameters, see: >> >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/arp-parameters/arp-parameters.xhtml >> >> and we get occasional requests for new allocations. However, the IANA >> page lists the registration procedures as "not defined?". This is why I >> am asking. Is this because we have missed the rules, or because they >> simply do not exist? >> >> Jari >> > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkj/XbYACgkQE5f5cImnZrtgwgCfTn8af0K3ipV1gthJ3fEj9PuE V3UAoIDOvJT2uO6xfDRyke4Cpu4UTP5Z =vtUc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
