Hi Jari, Thanks, holding it in BEHAVE is fine provided that everyone with a vested interest participates. Otherwise we will continue to have the same problem.
Eric On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric, > > As the NAT66 discussion seems to be happening in several WGs at once, it >> seems to me (and Tim) that you should try to hold some sort of joint meeting >> in INT-AREA to get some sort of consensus yes or no for NAT in v6 or at >> least to do a gap analysis >> Current Groups working on it are v6OPS, BEHAVE, Softwires, RRG, and now >> v6. >> > > We considered this, but at the end decided that its better to keep the > biggest nat66 discussion in one place, and that is going to be BEHAVE. They > have enough time for it, and many people will be attending. I hope people > from this list will, too. > > I am aware that there will be some other discussions as well. It might be > that a full BOF next time might the best place to make decisions. > > Jari > >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
