Dave Thaler a écrit : >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Akira Nakagawa >> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 6:45 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Int-area] ISP Shared Address QA >> >> >> All, >> >> This is Akira Nakagawa, Tokyo. >> > >> (Q7) ISP Shared address will be used by end users. >> >> (A7) Same case happens nowadays. If end users use Global Address block >> that >> is same block as ISP's Global address block, address blocks will >> duplicate. >> >> >> >> >> (Q8) Show the technical reason to use new IANA Unicast. >> >> (A8) I showed the problem of RFC1918 private address at the page 4 of >> this >> presentation in Minneapolis. >> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/intarea-1.pdf >> Miyakawa-san showed the 240/4 problem at int-area@ ML. I copied it to >> this >> mail at (Q5)/(A5) above. >> So we need IANA Unicast block. > > You didn't mention my comment in your list below. > > (Q9) ISPs aren't special. Corporate VPNs have the same problem with > conflicting space, for example. (I believe there are other examples > but VPN's are the most well known.) If ISPs get a space, then so > should VPNs and various other things. >
Dave, I think this point is covered in Q7 above. Marc. -- ========= IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley, 2006. http://www.ipv6book.ca Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
