Folks,
The IESG would like to know whether people believe that
we can go directly to our first LISP WG meeting at the
next IETF, or if another WG forming BOF is necessary.
Here are the current facts on the ground:
o We have fairly mature set of core drafts
o There are a number of other (non-core) LISP drafts
o Significant global deployment is underway
o We have 2 (or more) implementations
o We have been discussing a draft charter (see update below)
The question is that I would like folks to respond to is
"Should a WG be formed based on the draft agenda
(see below), or should we have another BOF?"
Please give your opinion as soon as possible so we can
close on these administrative issues.
Thanks,
Dave
--
LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol)
Last Modified: 2009-01-20
Chair(s):
TBD
Internet Area Director(s):
TBD
Routing Area Advisor:
TBD
Secretary(ies):
TBD
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion: [email protected]
Description of Working Group:
LISP and companion documents (see below) are proposals that
respond to the problems discussed at the IAB's October, 2006
Routing and Addressing Workshop [0]. The purpose of the BOF is to
form a working group whose charter (see below) is to work on the
design on the LISP base protocol [1], the LISP+ALT mapping system
[2], LISP Interworking [4] and LISP multicast [6]. The working
group will encourage and support interoperable LISP
implementations as well as defining requirements for alternate
mapping systems. The Working Group may also create EID-prefix
assignment guidelines for RIRs, as well as security profiles for
the ALT (presumably using technology developed in the SIDR
working group).
Goals and Milestones:
Mar 2010 Submit base LISP specification to the IESG for
Experimental.
Mar 2010 Submit base ALT specification to the IESG for
Experimental.
Mar 2010 Submit the LISP Interworking specification to the IESG
for Experimental.
June 2010 Submit Recommendations for Allocation and Routing
of both EIDs and RLOCs to the IESG for Experimental.
June 2010 Submit Recommendations for Securing the LISP Mapping
System to the IESG for Experimental.
July 2010 Submit LISP for Multicast Environments to the IESG for
Experimental.
Aug 2010 Re-charter or close.
Internet-Drafts:
draft-farinacci-lisp-11.txt
draft-farinacci-lisp-multicast-01.txt
draft-fuller-lisp-alt-03.txt
draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-02.txt
Request For Comments:
None
References
----------
[0] Meyer, D. et. al., "Report from the IAB Workshop on
Routing and Addressing", RFC 4984.
[1] Farinacci, D. et. al., "Locator/ID Separation Protocol
(LISP)", draft-farinacci-lisp-11.txt.
[2] Fuller, V., et. al., "LISP Alternative Topology
(LISP-ALT)", draft-fuller-lisp-alt-03.txt
[3] Iannone, L., and O. Bonaventure, "OpenLISP Implementation
Report", draft-iannone-openlisp-implementation-00.txt.
[4] Lewis, D., et. al., "Interworking LISP with IPv4 and
IPv6", draft-lewis-lisp-interworking-02.txt.
[5] Mathy, L., et. al., "LISP-DHT: Towards a DHT to map
identifiers onto locators", draft-mathy-lisp-dht-00.txt.
[6] Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., Zwiebel, J., and S. Venaas,
"LISP for Multicast Environments",
draft-farinacci-lisp-multicast-01.txt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
