I share your concern about the (or the lack of real) privacy considerations. I know the IETF is still dominated by people from a country where privacy is not a fundamental right so can be considered as a side question. BTW I question if some authors (one lives in the same city than me so should share my concerns?) intimately believe this whole stuff should be simply forbidden to preserve the privacy but they don't follow the right way.
To summarize my position: 1- I believe this (the devices described in the document) infringes my rights as an European citizen (cf European Human Rights) but I am not a lawyer so it has to be tested in a court 2- one is not allow to organize public meetings to discuss how to perform clearly illegal actions, in particular from a standardization body 3- as far as I know the legal umbrella of the IETF is the Internet Society so I propose suggest if no other way to solve the legal issue to sue the Internet Society at the next meeting in Paris in a French court on the 1 and 2 basis (e.g., to pay a court bailiff to officially see 2...) Regards francis.dup...@fdupont.fr _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
