On Nov 18, 2011, at 10:18 AM, "Dan Wing" <dw...@cisco.com> wrote: > I would not want to say that Baidu's use of NAT66 (or NPTv6) > provides justification for an internet service provider to > use NAT66 or NPTv6.
Indeed, when this showed up on the chart, it was difficult to understand what purpose the NAT66 devices served in the diagram. That is to say, we have not even heard a justification for why Baidu needed or wanted this functionality, much less why someone else would. _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
