Hi Med, On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:43 AM, <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote:
> ** > Hi Behcet, > > I have two comments: > > * Host identification issue is valid for any address sharing mechanism. > I am not sure on A+P? A+P requires point-to-point link, right? > This is why the introduction mentions already the following: > > As reported in [RFC6269 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6269>], several > issues are encountered when an IP > address is shared among several subscribers. These issues are > encountered in various deployment contexts: e.g., Carrier Grade NAT > (CGN), application proxies or A+P [RFC6346 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6346>]. > > * RFC6346 is provided as an example of a solution making use of port sets. > You are right, other solutions (than a+p) can be considered but having one > pointer to a solution example is just fair. No need to be exhaustive here. > > Again, I am not sure if Section 4.6 describes what A+P says? Regards, Behcet > >> >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
