Getting back to our earlier discussion, IP-in-UDP and GUE are currently two 
half-solutions. Put them together and you get a whole solution.
Keep them apart, and someone else is going to have to write a whole solution 
sometime down the line from now. 
[Lucy] GUE can support IP payload. Don't know why you state that they are two 
half-solutions. Is the compression a mandatory requirement here? I think that 
IP-in-UDP proposal as a compression version is better that use of first nibble. 
However we need clarify what limitation and constraint the compression solution 
has. 

Lucy 

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]

> However, if GUE payload is
> IP, it is OK to inspect the first nibble of the payload to determine IPv4 or 
> IPv6 because this aligns with IP protocol.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lucy
> 
> - Stewart
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to