Hi, Fred, To wrap up:
- Subnet Redirects appear to rely on AERO-specific mechanisms, so would not be of more general relevance to a bis doc IMO - multiple link addresses are already part of the Ethernet spec and already handled by most IP over Ethernet implementations (and TOS marking correlation is defined in 802.1p). When you assign more than one link address to a single physical interface, you're acting as if you have multiple links. At that point, the forwarding table indicates not only the next-hop IP but the outgoing link -- for multiple link addresses these are treated as different virtual interfaces already. - I agree that IPv6 ND was done in an INTAREA WG; the same might be true for AERO, but the INTAREA WG should be a place where generic aspects of all Internet layer issues should be addressed, not domain-specific solutions (IMO). AERO might be one doc, but it is 60+ pages with over 70 revisions. I don't think it would be useful to bog down INTAREA with something that large. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
