Hi, well, it's starts already confusing the industry:
https://www.cnx-software.com/2017/09/08/ipv10-specification-released-for-ipv6-ipv4-communications/ http://www.computerpartner.at/sites/dynamic.pl?id=news20080805131662703 (german only) Regards Nic -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Ron Bonica Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2017 21:09 An: int-area@ietf.org Betreff: Re: [Int-area] IP-not-v10 Maybe the mailing list should be named after the problem that it purports to solve, as opposed the solution that Khaled hopes it will generate. After all, we have no idea whether the mailing list will generate a new version of IP at all. Furthermore, giving the mailing list a name that suggests that there will be yet another version of IP may confuse the industry. Ron _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
