In the "credit where credit is due" department, I should point out that the cogent summary that a bunch of us are +1-ing was written by Tom Herbert.
Thanks, --David > -----Original Message----- > From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 3:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10) > > Agree > > > > > > On 10/10/2017 12:49 AM, Black, David wrote: > > >> The draft and the concept have been thoroughly discussed on int-area > > >> list (twice). I don't see that the problem is worth solving, the > > >> proposed solution is remotely feasible, or that the author is willing > > >> to apply feedback from the discussion. I am not interested in further > > >> discussions about this. > > > +1, --David > > > *********************************** > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
