Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-intarea-probe-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-probe/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- No objection to the publication of this document. However, some comments. So basically you specify the same functionality as remote ping MIB in RFC4560 where - probing interface = SNMP manager - proxy interface = SNMP agent - probed agent = destination Right? So any connection with RFC4560? I guess this mechanism is a similar functionality as RFC 6812, where - proxy agent = sender - responder = destination ... even the technology is not based on the ICMP extended echo As such I believe that the RFC 6812 IPR applies here as well. However, I'm not the one to make the call. So I will forward to the appropriate persons. Potentially the OWAMP IPRs apply as well. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-ippm-owdp _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
