And the link layer could include capabilities such as described in RFC 1990...
> On Sep 13, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fred, > >> Ron, it is just a drop in the bucket compared with the amount of discussion >> since >> "Fragmentation Considered Harmful (1987)". But, I think we now clearly see a >> case where fragmentation is *required*. > > Absolutely. As tunnels produce a new link-layer, that can (should) be a > function of that link-layer. > Network layer fragmentation is not needed for that. > (For the purpose of making the point and to set future direction, ignoring > existing IP tunnel mechanisms). > > Cheers, > Ole > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
