On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:18:56AM +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > On 02/06/2020 10:13, Derek Fawcus wrote: > > Given the general 'no encryption' rule for HAM transmissions, how about > > making use of WESP (RFC 5840) when traversing an amateur RF link, > > and ESP when going over other links with non-NULL encryption? > > I did not know about WESP, thank you for pointing it out. > > Do you know of any software that currently implements WESP?
That I have no idea about. I happened to stumble upon it recently while chasing down extension header parsing scenarios in the context of IPv4. > To maximize interoperability I'd like to only recommend the use of > features that are currently available. Though it looks like it may be possible to implement is as a BITW, with the bumps themselves doing the heuristic guessing. So the RF endpoints could do the work, and drop anything which the heuristics can't match. A bit nasty unless those endpoints are also tunneling. DF _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
