Regarding RSOO, that’s fine if it doesn’t meet your needs. Just wanted to raise it as it probably isn’t considered as often as it should be.
* Bernie From: Daniel Migault <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 1:11 PM To: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Cc: Ted Lemon <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Bernie Volz (volz) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-12 Hi, Thank you all for the feedbacks. I will perform the editorial once we have settled the terminology. Regarding the use of a DHCP Relay, we could of course make a use case of it, but I believe it would go beyond the simplicity of the targeted architecture and I would rather not consider this as RSOO enabled. Yours, Daniel On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:10 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]<mailto:mcr%[email protected]>> wrote: Ted Lemon <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On May 5, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]<mailto:mcr%[email protected]>> > wrote: >> The end user might suffer slightly by having locally served reverse >> names that are no longer connected: they should obsolete that zone >> when they realize that their PD hasn't been renewed, until such time, >> (if it was a flash renumber), they would be right to think that they >> legitimately control them. > In practice I don’t think this is an issue. The reverse lookup is > usually triggered by receipt of a message from an IP address, so as > long as the IP address is still in use internally, the presence of the > reverse zone is wanted. When the address changes, the old zone becomes > obsolete whether it continues to be served or not. The likelihood of > the zone being re-allocated to some other network for which the > original network will then do a reverse lookup is very small, so I > don’t think there’s any reason to be concerned about this. I agree with you completely. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]<mailto:mcr%[email protected]>> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
