[Resending from Moderators account] Hi all
This draft (draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00) is being discussed across three different lists - intarea, ipv6 and the IETF list. As the latter list is for general topics only [1], I am removing it from the thread. Please continue to discuss on the intarea list, and if appropriate ipv6. A simple 'reply all' should now achieve this.
Thanks, Chris Box on behalf of the Moderators team for i...@ietf.org [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html [1] --- From: Robinson, Herbie <Herbie.Robinson=40stratus....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 18:55Subject: Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-ipid-ext-00.txt To: to...@strayalpha.com <to...@strayalpha.com>, Templin (US), Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com> Cc: IETF intarea WG <int-area@ietf.org>, IPv6 List <i...@ietf.org>, ietf <i...@ietf.org>
I would agree it must not be there when DF is 1. When DF is zero, there is always the possibility that a forwarding router will fragment the packet. From a practical standpoint, one wants the originator of the packet to provide the option whenever sending to a different subnet.
Links: ------ [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
