On Fri, Sep 27, 2024, 4:46 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28-Sep-24 02:58, Templin (US), Fred L wrote: > > ... > > No one that I know of has suggested obsoleting RFC2675 - my documents do > not say "obsoletes" (nor even "updates"). > > Just to wrap that up: I seem to remember the RFC2675 extension header > being mentioned as a candidate for deprecation during some discussion of > HbH extensions in recent years. > Brian, I think it falls under the category of "things in protocols some people want to deprecate because they are unaware of deployed use cases". Like: - jumbograms are used by Linux and some device offloads - some applications are using the full twenty bits of entropy in the flow label - there are valid use cases and deployment of IP fragmentation Tom > Brian >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
