Dear authors, dear intarea WG, As you may have seen the IESG ballots[1] for the evaluation of draft-ietf-intarea-icmp-exten-hdr-len has currently 2 blocking DISCUSS with several blocking issues, moreover other ADs support the DISCUSS...
My reading of the blocking issues are around whether this draft is useful and how the backward compatibility. The AD review[2] had related points. To let authors to address the backward compatibility issue (which still worries me), I have removed the IESG evaluation from the 21st of August telechat and will move it back to a future telechat to have it on the same telechat as draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis, this delay should increase the chances of positive evaluation. Suggested actions by authors of: - draft-ietf-intarea-icmp-exten-hdr-len work on the other comments by submitting a revised I-D - draft-ietf-intarea-rfc8335bis: the above is an incentive to work faster on this I-D ;-) else the I-D is not impacted at all by the decision My own take is that the rfc8335bis is the main (if not the only) motivation for icmp-exen-hdr-len draft, so, if the PROBE bis could do without requiring the exn-hdr-len, then this will even be easier ;-) Regards -éric [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-icmp-exten-hdr-len/ballot/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/Ba-worazRWFqwwLQctwdO_H42LM/ Bcc: DISCUSS holders
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
