This looks to address my comments. I did notice a missing space at:
*
in{{I-D.draft-ietf-intarea-extended-icmp-nodeid}}
Joe
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2025 at 16:32
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Re: Working Group Last Call: IPv4 routes with an IPv6
next hop
> That said, I wonder if this isn’t a draft that might benefit from a
> consolidated Operational Considerations section
I've tried my best. We'll see what my co-authors say.
In case you want to review it, it's here:
https://github.com/wkumari/draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6/blob/main/draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6.md#operational-considerations
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
