> jak>> What are your expectations about what advertising 'L=1' means
for the
> link?
The criteria that allow a prefix to be advertised with 'L=1' are
covered under the final paragraph of the offered text, and what
advertising 'L=1' means for the link is covered under RFC2461.
> The point of the offered text is that by following the guidelines
> a NETLMM domain cannot be a multilink subnet. I can call it something
> like "Multilink Subnet Avoidance" if you'd like.
>
> jak>> "Cannot avoid a multilink subnet"? Then why call it "Multilink
Subnet
> Avoidance"?'
I don't quite understand your question, but the offered text avoids
multilink subnets.
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jak
Here is the offered text again:
"5. Multilink Subnet Considerations
An individual prefix is an IP prefix associated with a specific
MN, and a shared prefix is an IP prefix that may be associated
with multiple MNs.
ARs must not include an individual prefix in RAs that may be
received by a MN other than the one associated with the prefix.
ARs must not send RAs that include a shared prefix in a Prefix
Information Option with 'A'=1 unless there is operational assurance
of duplicate address detection/avoidance across the NETLMM domain.
ARs must not send RAs that include an individual or shared prefix
in a Prefix Information Option with 'L'=1 unless all RAs that
include the prefix and all MNs that receive them are associated
with a single link."
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area