> jak>> What are your expectations about  what advertising 'L=1' means
for the 
> link?

The criteria that allow a prefix to be advertised with 'L=1' are
covered under the final paragraph of the offered text, and what
advertising 'L=1' means for the link is covered under RFC2461.

> The point of the offered text is that by following the guidelines
> a NETLMM domain cannot be a multilink subnet. I can call it something
> like "Multilink Subnet Avoidance" if you'd like.
>
> jak>> "Cannot avoid a multilink subnet"? Then why call it "Multilink
Subnet 
> Avoidance"?'

I don't quite understand your question, but the offered text avoids
multilink subnets.

Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


            jak

Here is the offered text again:

"5.  Multilink Subnet Considerations

An individual prefix is an IP prefix associated with a specific
MN, and a shared prefix is an IP prefix that may be associated
with multiple MNs.

ARs must not include an individual prefix in RAs that may be
received by a MN other than the one associated with the prefix.

ARs must not send RAs that include a shared prefix in a Prefix
Information Option with 'A'=1 unless there is operational assurance
of duplicate address detection/avoidance across the NETLMM domain.

ARs must not send RAs that include an individual or shared prefix
in a Prefix Information Option with 'L'=1 unless all RAs that
include the prefix and all MNs that receive them are associated
with a single link."

Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area



_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to