That explains a bit better why the existing solution "cannot be used" ...
Pekka, thanks for the pointer!
Pekka Savola wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Alper Yegin wrote:
There does not appear to be a strong justification to hack DHCP the
way you
are proposing. Many people spoke against that already.
FWIW, Cisco has claimed IPR on the DHCP solution:
http://www1.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/cisco-ipr-draft-pruss-dhcp-auth-dsl-00.txt
I wonder if other solutions are similarly affected.
Just something to chew on when looking at potentially applicable
solutions...
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
