Along with Iljitsch's draft, please also consider taking
on sprite-mtu as a work item (or suggest a specific wg):

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-templin-inetmtu-05.txt

Thanks - Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:01 AM
> To: Internet Area
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-01.txt
> 
> Is int-area interested in taking this on as work?
> 
> If not, other suggestions about what to do with it?
> 
> Iljitsch
> 
> 
> On 30 aug 2007, at 0:13, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've updated my multi-mtu draft:
> >
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-01.txt
> >
> > Other than some minor text issues that caught my eye I 
> didn't change  
> > the discussion about the larger packet downsides and CRC issues.
> >
> > The router advertisement is now much simpler and contains a 
> priority  
> > and three MTUs: for 1000, 100/unknown-speed and 10 Mbps. 
> However, I  
> > do introduce two new flags: one that suggests that nodes are  
> > "conservative" in probing neighbor MTUs (I'm not 100% convinced  
> > about this one) and one that tells hosts do skip the 
> probing so it's  
> > possible to have a subnet with both nodes that support all of this  
> > and ones that are simply configured with a non-standard MTU, i.e.,  
> > interoperate with current jumbo frame deployments.
> >
> > The switch message is gone and there is more discussion about  
> > probing. If anyone has additional jumbo frame sizes seen in the  
> > wild, please let me know. Probing is now done using neighbor  
> > discovery with IPv6 but that requires breaking RFC 2461 under some  
> > circumstances. For IPv4 it's done with jumbo ARP. The text 
> is fairly  
> > rough and I didn't spell check (takes forever on texts like 
> this) so  
> > don't mind the typos.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to