Hi Jari,
While I certainly do not disagree that the IETF is welcome to undertake
requirements analysis of set protocols, solution tools and techniques
that could apply to the DSLForum requirements, I cannot think of a place
less suited to doing this with the cost of per use broadband and
interest of the Internet in mind than the PANA WG.
- Ric
Alper Yegin wrote, around 5/12/07 6:00 PM:
Hi Jari,
DSLF's May 25 liaison that stated:
"We are not currently aware of a solution specified in the industry that
meets our requirements. Can you advise us if you have a specified solution
or whether a suitable solution is under your consideration."
I think what we can do in our response is to notify DSLF that IETF PANA WG
was chartered for this problem space and the PANA protocol specification is
approved by IETF for publication as a Proposed Standard.
Can we please include that in our response to DSLF along with whatever else
would be said about the past int-area discussions?
As for the detailed requirement analysis, this is something we already
started doing in PANA WG. In order not to delay your liaison letter, you
could mention that requirements analysis is in progress. That analysis
should not hold us from sharing the aforementioned facts.
Regards,
Alper
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
