Eliot,
I would like to
re-iterate what I said in the meeting, speaking for myself: there
is no
Plan B. We need to go to IPv6. The only question for me is how do we
transition in an orderly and responsible fashion?
If there is no "Plan B", then would be putting all of our resources
behind "Plan A". To quote Scott McNeally, "all the wood behind one
arrow".
If support for 240/4 requires IPv4 code changes then we shouldn't do it.
The only scenario that makes sense to me to use 240/4 as non-reserved
address space is if it's use can help move us to IPv6 (e.g., Plan A).
Bob
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
