On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:22:16 -0700, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:02:09 +0000, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> 
> wrote:
> 
> > A broken implementation of is_pot() prevented the detection of when a
> > singular pipe was enabled.
> 
> > -   return mask && (mask & -mask) == 0;
> > +   return mask && (mask & -mask) == mask;
> 
> I think the form
> 
>         mask && (mask & (mask - 1)) == 0
> 
> is easier to reason about.

I've reassigned authorship to Yuanhan and gone with your preferred form.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to