On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:15:19PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:37:03 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:31:54PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > We only want to mark the transition from unfenced GPU access by an > > > execbuffer, so that we are forced to flush any pending writes through > > > the fence before updating the register. > > > > The idea behind this change sounds good. > > Whilst I have you in agreement, what do I need to do get your r-b on the > simple bug fix first? ;-) Oops, that went mia. So if you want to roll the bugfix independently
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Just add a small comment in the commit msg that it essentially disables that optimization, in case somebody bisects a performance regression to this. -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
