On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:01:50 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:59:17 +0100 > Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > So I think we just want IS_GEN7() for IVB code. > > I'd rather keep them separate since we know we'll have gen7 chips with > different display engines in the future. I've been trying to use > IS_GEN for render related checks, IS_IVB for specific display checks, > and HAS_PCH for the ilk+ split (though for the most part that should go > away with proper function call backs).
If there is method to the madness, fine. I like the explanation and so perhaps we should include that in the code somewhere. And we just need to make sure we are consistent in our usage. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
