On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:12:16PM +0000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:16:25AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > >> It is never correct to use intel_crtc->bpp in intel_dp_link_required, > >> so instead pass an explicit bpp in to this function. This patch > >> only supports 18bpp and 24bpp modes, which means that 10bpc modes will > >> be computed incorrectly. Fixing that will require more extensive > >> changes, and so must be addressed separately from this bugfix. > >> > >> intel_dp_link_required is called from intel_dp_mode_valid and > >> intel_dp_mode_fixup. > >> > >> * intel_dp_mode_valid is called to list supported modes; in this case, > >> the current crtc values cannot be relevant as the modes in question > >> may never be selected. Thus, using intel_crtc->bpp is never right. > >> > >> * intel_dp_mode_fixup is called during mode setting, but it is run > >> well before ironlake_crtc_mode_set is called to set intel_crtc->bpp, > >> so using intel_crtc-bpp in this path can only ever get a stale > >> value. > >> > >> Cc: Lubos Kolouch <lubos.kolo...@gmail.com> > >> Cc: Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42263 > > Tested-by: cama...@picnicpark.org (Dell Latitude 6510) > > > > Not the original reporter and might not exactly be this bug, but likely. > > -Daniel > > Tested-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
Another bugzilla for this patch: Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44881 Tested-by: Roland Dreier <rol...@digitalvampire.org> -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
