On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 14:32, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Like in this patch, the defines indentation in some patches in this > series sounds strange, wrong, or at least different from the one > already in use. > > So, since I don't know if we should care about indentation now, for > those patches I'll just mark like this: > > * indentation > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@gmail.com> > The identation is different between registers themselves (e.g., 0xSOMETHING) and the bits we use in those registers (e.g., (1<<31)). So this is on purpose. -- Eugeni Dodonov <http://eugeni.dodonov.net/>
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
